Robert Bridge
Once again, the American people are left scratching their heads, much like they were following the assassination of JFK and the attacks of 9/11.
As a small but vocal group of Kirk supporters shed doubt on the official narrative surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination, newly released documents show the prominent MAGA leader's state of mind just days before his untimely death.
Turning Point USA (TPUSA), the pro-conservative group founded by the late Charlie Kirk, is on the brink of anarchy as questions continue to be raised over inflammatory remarks made by Kirk prior to his death.
Some close friends and colleagues of Kirk, including the prominent podcaster Candace Owens (who has attracted notoriety of late for claiming that French President Emmanuel Macron's wife Brigitte was born a man), are of the opinion that the 31-year-old had become the target of an assassin's bullet due to anti-Israeli comments he made just two days prior to his death.
As Owens has reported , Kirk privately complained in a group chat of nine individuals, which included Josh Hammer, a Jewish-American contributor and editor at large with Newsweek, that a Jewish donor had withdrawn a $2 million investment to the organization because he refused to disinvite Carlson from the upcoming AmericaFest event.
"Just lost another huge Jewish donor," Kirk complained. "$2 million a year because we won't cancel Tucker. I'm thinking of inviting Candace."
"Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes," he continued. "I cannot and will not be bullied like this."
Kirk concludes: 'Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause.'
Following the assassination of the right-wing political activist during a large public speaking event on the campus of the Utah Valley University on September 10, Owens contends that it was suspicious that Hammer failed to mention Kirk's anti-Israeli remarks, while also referencing a seemingly random social media post that Hammer wrote that alluded to public executions just one day before Kirk was murdered.
"I knew nothing about Josh Hammer's random tweet about public executions the night before Charlie was publicly executed. In what context does that tweet make sense? Literally WTF," Owens wrote on X.
After independent journalist Yashar Ali suggested that Hammer's post was related to the brutal murder of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zartutska on a subway in North Carolina, Owens was having none of it.
"There is not a single shred of proof that you can produce that Josh Hammer was referring to Iryna. Not one. Not even his own public statements about Iryna's murder. There was no new information about her murder that day so it wasn't even trending," declared Owens. "You are just covering for him and it won't work."
In other words, Owen was strongly hinting that Hammer and others must have had some foreknowledge of Kirk's upcoming and untimely death.
In a lengthy response, Hammer denounced Owens and shared the final texts he exchanged with Kirk.
"I have been extremely reluctant to post screenshots from a murdered friend. It feels icky. I don't like. But while I was offline this week for a holiday, a high-profile, deeply unwell lunatic [here Hammer is speaking about Owens] used screenshots of an intimate group chat I was in with Charlie Kirk and some others to impugn my character in the worst way and allege I somehow had foreknowledge (or worse) of my own friend's horrific assassination," he began.
Hammer argued that Kirk was just "sarcastically blowing off steam" over the Jewish donors pulling their funding, while the notion that Kirk was "turning" on his support for the Jewish people was "an egregious lie."
"Charlie was passionate about fighting the mind virus of conspiratorial Jew-hatred-something he made clear over and over and over again... Emotions can run high at times, but Charlie Kirk remained a true friend of the Jewish people and the Jewish state to the very end."
Meanwhile, conspiracy theories continue to swirl over the death of Charlie Kirk, who in all likelihood would have gone on to become a high-ranking American politician, and possibly president. Could the highly influential Israeli Lobby risk having such a man in a position of great power?
Whatever the case may be, there is a growing contingency who say that Kirk's alleged assassin, Tyler Robinson, 22, was a patsy much like Lee Harvey Oswald in the JFK assassination. Many commentators have concluded based on video and photographic evidence that Robinson was never seen carrying the four-foot long Mauser 98 bolt action rifle, while there would not have been time to break down the bulky weapon following the shooting as has been reported.
Moreover, an elderly man in the crowd during the shooting helped to distract police from finding the real killer.
As Veterans Today has reported: "In the shocking first moments of the gunshot that ended Charlie's young life, a man, George Zinn, suddenly and strangely stepped forward and began screaming like a maniac, 'Shoot me, shoot me,' so much so that many immediately assumed he was the assassin of the activist close to Donald Trump.
"Zinn, however, had a different role, he was almost certainly a diversion, a smokescreen."
Once again, the American people are left scratching their heads, much like they were following the assassination of JFK and the attacks of 9/11. Few modern-day tragedies occur in the United States these days without some high degree of justified speculation. Thus, we may rest assured that questions will continue to linger over the death of Charlie Kirk for many years to come.