By Allan Stevo
January 10, 2026
One night, my daughter suffered infantile seizures for hours. Never had I seen this healthy baby, nearly a year old, experience anything like that. That afternoon, one of her eyes began to droop - the first indication that she was having a neurological reaction. Eventually, she suffered developmental regression.
Believing the lie that vaccines are safe and effective, one of my daughter's caretakers took her quietly for a round of vaccines that morning and did not have the decency to fess up once weird symptoms appeared.
It would be another nine months before that betrayal became clear. One day, just out of curiosity, I called the doctor's office and learned that my daughter had been brought for shots nine months earlier. I copied the appointment date and went into my phone to find the date of the droopy eye day.
That was the day.
I, too, believed vaccines were largely safe and effective, but we had all agreed that she would not be given vaccines until we were confronted with the decision of what to do when it was time to send our daughter to school. We would give her neurological system time to grow robust, before offering her that potential neurological insult.
We had a caretaker who claimed to be on board with that plan, but was not. You might be surprised how easy it is for any seemingly decent person you trust your child with to take that child to the doctor for 15 minutes and get that child injected with biologically sourced therapeutics that may have lifelong consequences. It is easy, and a perversion of life, liberty, and property for that to be so easily done to a child.
I was so knuckle-headedly naive about the safety of vaccines that I might not have been convinced any other way: I knew something was wrong with my daughter. I did not know that anything uncommon happened that morning. For months, I wondered what could possibly have occurred, and remained on the lookout for similar symptoms.
Before I would learn of that betrayal, that same caretaker snuck her to the doctor for another round of vaccines. This second time, my daughter received even more vaccines in one day. My daughter experienced developmental regression: in walking and movement, in communication, and in methods of play.
When I later asked the pediatrician about why she had given so many vaccines at one time, "a catch-up dose" is the phrase the pediatrician would say, downplaying the negligent amount of aluminum she had injected into a baby in one day.
My daughter had been paid a neurological insult and it showed. Had I not been blindfolded through it all, I might doubt the conclusions I drew. The timing between vaccine administration and injury was too precise to ignore.
When I finally realized what had taken place, the gaslighting began. The pediatrician who administered the shots refused to acknowledge that any such regression had taken place and downplayed the significance of that night of infantile seizures.
I, by this time, knew what VAERS was - the federal vaccine injury database. I requested the doctor make a VAERS report. No report that I know of was made. The idea that a singlet vaccine injury datapoint makes it into VAERS astounds me. Incentives are weighted against reporting.
Patient-First Medicine?
Pediatrics has become vaccine peddling and compliance coercion, not a field prioritizing the interest of the patient. To walk into many pediatricians' offices, is to walk into a non-health-promoting environment.
If a pediatrician will be consulted at all, it must be through the lens of a primary care physician who understands the tremendous disadvantages of a patient entering that office.
I wish the list of doctors operating that way stopped there. It does not. This tendency stretches across medicine. In many fields, patients do not improve reliably, but improve coincidentally. In many fields, patients do not begin the process of full disclosure of injuries until after injuries appear. In many fields, patients do not begin the process of full disclosure of the efficacy of the intervention until after the intervention. Some doctors point fingers at "bad doctors." To the contrary, mediocre disclosure is standard practice.
Secretary Kennedy
Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert Kennedy has long been a champion for safe and effective medical care. I honor his efforts.
Only eleven months into the Second Trump Administration, Kennedy has assembled a team that removed the preposterous Hepatitis B vaccine requirement: an unsafe and longterm ineffective sexually transmitted disease vaccine pushed on the parents of ultra-low-risk infants by medical staff at the insistence of the CDC "at birth." Not only should no one accept that shot for a child, but no one should put faith in a person who would recommend that shot for a child.
Kennedy has, also, led the way in reducing other vaccine requirements. A new vaccine schedule drastically reduces vaccine requirements on American children, more in line with Europe.
Thank You Secretary Kennedy And Thank You President Trump
This is a beginning that I am grateful to see, a step in the right direction. Kennedy, however, knows the science well enough to know that this is a minor victory, at best. If MAHA stops here, MAHA will have scored an L and not a W.
My Personal Complaint With Secretary Kennedy And President Trump On This Matter
Dear Secretary Kennedy, all you have to do is convince me that the vaccine schedule is safe and effective - of significantly less risk to any healthy individual than the risk of a disease itself.
At this time, I believe you cannot, and because of that, I believe it improper for you to oversee any system encouraging vaccination.
It is immoral to stop at anything other than 1.) total cessation of recommendations and 2.) vigorous legal attacks on governmental entities that coerce vaccination.
That would be constitutional behavior by HHS. Our founding documents, make it the government's job to protect life, liberty, and property.
Kennedy's Crappy Vaccine Schedule
Kennedy's crappy schedule continues to vaccinate 2-month-olds, continues to batch vaccines such as TDAP and MMR thereby reducing informed choice, and forces irrelevant inoculations on the population - polio the most striking among them. Also, it continues to walk in the hubris of ignoring ecological niche replacement in which vaccines appear to not reduce the rate of illness, only shift illness to other serotypes, pathogens, or etiologies.
The vaccine schedule has been rolled back to resemble the schedule of 25 years ago, to the late 1990s and early 2000s, though it remains significantly more aggressive of a vaccine schedule in a number of ways.
Much more must be done. Vaccine science is unsafe the way it is being practiced. A CDC recommended vaccine schedule, in the minds of many, carries with it the imprimatur of safety. But there is no such implied imprimatur of safety from the CDC. To believe otherwise is to deceive oneself.
How To Protect Your Loved Ones From Kennedy's Crappy Vaccine Schedule
Where I stand, that means under the current vaccine regime being overseen by President Trump and Secretary Kennedy, no parent should put a single vaccine in a child. They are not inert placebo tested for safety and efficacy across the population, and they are certainly not tested for safety and efficacy in your individual child.
We have much to learn about why some children turn into lifelong, diaper-wearing vegetables upon being injected with a vaccine. And we should not expect any parent to have to choose that Russian roulette option.
Societally, we must widely encourage all parents to stop accepting even a single vaccine for a child, for themselves, or for any loved one until the practice has been proven abundantly safe: not just across the population but also for your patient individually.
How We Got Here - A Predictable Outcome Of Bad Policy
Through the decades-long policy of
- coercing parents,
- forcing parents,
- making legal liability impossible,
- hiding research findings,
- declining to investigate individual predisposition to vaccine side effects,
decades have been wasted in which this matter could have at least started to be addressed.
Anthony Fauci and his cohorts will long be the face of why American (and global) vaccine science is so abysmally unable to answer the question of individual safety with any seriousness.
Sadly, what could be a useful area of medicine - vaccine science - has been turned by profit-seekers and yes-men into nothing but a guessing game of how badly harmed a vaccine recipient will be. This is truly pathetic, and no way to practice medicine, yet that is what we call acceptable in this, the wealthiest nation to have ever existed.
For all the fanfare, Kennedy continues to have a crappy vaccine schedule on his hands.
Unlike Many Government Policies, The CDC Schedule Impacts Real People In Real Ways, And On A Vast Scale
The reality is that every vaccine my daughter receives comes with risk of additional neurological damage, damage that is too great a risk to warrant her ever being given a vaccine again.
So, that CDC schedule is important, because it limits the ability for anyone to stand up and say, "The prevention is worse than the illness, and I will choose the risk of illness over the act of prevention."
I do not know that the risk of prevention is certain to be worse than the disease for everyone. But I know that for my daughter, based on the attentive parental eye that she was shown after the first two rounds of covert immunizations, for my daughter, the risk of prevention is so much more dangerous than the disease.
A non-zero number of parents will not only be coerced by medical staff, but will be threatened this day with action by Child Protective Services for disagreeing with a vaccine schedule. That number is likely in the hundreds or thousands this day alone.
- Will Kennedy's CDC show up to defend parents in the doctor's office before a threat is realized?
- Will Trump's Department of Justice show up to defend parents from CPS before a threat is realized?
- Will Trump's National Guard show up to defend parents from law enforcement before a threat is realized?
If the answer is no, then the CDC vaccine schedule has to be done away with until vaccines are reliably known to be safe and effective at the individual level. Unfortunately, at the present time, no parent, or patient is able to know that the next visit to the doctor's office for a vaccine will not end in tragedy. The results are reliably unpredictable.
As long as the CDC has a schedule, it makes it just a little easier for someone, to force a vaccine on a child, and for parental responsibility over the matter to be denied. Secretary Kennedy is overseeing that system.
Not only is every vaccine an additional danger, but every ingredient to the vaccine is an additional danger.
Time is of the essence. With every passing day, more children are endangered.
What Now ? What Can Parents Do?
Refuse to be forced into compliance again, demand better from government and drug manufacturers, and they will 1. either deliver or 2. vaccines will vanish.
Until that time, it makes sense to reject all vaccines, and to brush up on millennia of remedies that were effective before there was supposedly a pill able to fix man's every woe. Prepare remedies before an emergency, because once an unprepared-for emergency arises, the only choice you leave yourself is to walk into an emergency room.
Here, I write about children. Don't even get me started on the observable differences in animals who have been vaccinated as opposed to those who have not been.
In this era, one vaccine is too much. The past is behind us, so work on healing from past vaccine injuries as needed, but do not accept a single dose more for any reason - especially not for the specious reason, "Well, I'm tainted by vaccines already."
The downside of taking a vaccine is simply too great, and the risk from illness too small in one fed proper nutrition and properly cared for in our era.
If that describes you, the best approach is to reject all vaccines and to communicate that necessity to loved ones.