The Future of Freedom Foundation
December 4, 2025
Last week, Washington Post columnist David Ignatius wrote about "a startling document" that the CIA has kept hidden for some 50 years. The document apparently said that "the Mexican government had investigated Kennedy's assassination and concluded Cuba was responsible."
It's just more misdirection on the part of the CIA. Its targeted audience is those Americans who cannot bring themselves to recognize that the Pentagon and the CIA orchestrated and carried out the assassination of a U.S. president. The misdirection serves to confuse and confound that segment of American society.
Oh, sure, that segment of Americans can accept that the U.S. national-security establishment does wield the power to assassinate people. They can also accept that the Pentagon and the CIA have, in fact, exercised this power by assassinating people. What they cannot accept is that this dark-side governmental apparatus with the power of assassination took out a U.S. president whose polices were considered to constitute a grave threat to "national security," which has been the most important term in the American political lexicon ever since the U.S. government was converted to a national-security state in the 1940s.
We know, for a fact, that there is no way that Cuba and its communist leader Fidel Castro assassinated JFK. How do we know that? Two ways:
1. The JFK autopsy. There is one undisputed aspect of the JFK assassination: It was the U.S. military establishment that conducted the fraudulent autopsy on JFK's body.
Not Cuba. Not the Soviet Union. Not Israel. Not the Mafia. Only one entity conducted the fraudulent autopsy: The U.S. military establishment.
That's how we know that the U.S. national-security establishment orchestrated and carried out the assassination itself. There is no innocent explanation for a fraudulent autopsy. None! Once fraud is established, it is case closed on the assassination itself.
That's because there can be only one reason for a fraudulent autopsy that took place just a few hours after the assassination. That reason has to be a cover-up in the assassination itself. What other reason could there be for a fraudulent autopsy on the body of a U.S. president that was conducted shortly after the assassination itself?
I have set forth much of the fraud in my book The Kennedy Autopsy, which is a synopsis of Douglas Horne's watershed 5-volume book Inside the Assassination Records Review Board. In my opinion, anyone who reads these two books with an open mind cannot help but conclude that this was a fraudulent autopsy.
For example, there were two separate brain examinations, the second of which involved a brain that could not have belonged to Kennedy. That's the brain examination that became part of the official autopsy. How can that not be considered evidence of fraud?
Or consider the fact that there were three casket entries into the Bethesda morgue, two of which were secret and surreptitious. How can that not be considered evidence of fraud?
2. At the time he was assassinated, JFK was reaching out to the Soviet Union and communist Cuba in an effort to bring an end to the Cold War and an end to the mindset of perpetual anti-Russia and anti-Cuba hostility that had been inculcated in the American people.
That's what his Peace Speech at American University was all about. He delivered it just four months before they took him out. In fact, that speech was essentially a declaration of war by JFK against the U.S. national-security establishment and its dark-side vision for the future direction of America. See FFF's book JFK's War with the National Security Establishment: Why Kennedy Was Assassinated by Douglas Horne, who served on the staff of the Assassination Records Review Board in the 1990s.
In fact, at the very moment he was assassinated, Kennedy had an emissary having lunch with Castro in an effort to normalize relations with Cuba. At the risk of belaboring the obvious, why would Castro be interested in assassinating a U.S. president who was bucking the Pentagon and the CIA by doing his best to restore normal relations with Cuba and Russia? At the risk of further belaboring the obvious, how could the Pentagon and the CIA permit such a president to remain in office, given that his policy of establishing peaceful and friendly relations with Russia and Cuba, they were convinced, posed a grave threat to U.S. "national security"?
My hunch is that the vast majority of Americans "know" that the official lone-nut theory of the JFK assassination is ridiculous. But many people within that majority still do not want to "know know" the truth. The truth still frightens them. It's that segment of American society that the CIA continues to target with its various assassination theories, like the "Cuba did it" theory, in an effort to confuse and confound them.
For Americans who decide that they want to "know know" the truth about the JFK assassination, all they have to do is study the fraudulent autopsy that was conducted on JFK's body. Once a critical mass of Americans come to the realization that the JFK autopsy was fraudulent, Americans will come to the firm realization as to why it is so critically important to their freedom, peace, and well-being to restore America's founding governmental system of a limited-government republic to our land.
Reprinted with permission from Future of Freedom Foundation.