Move along, there's nothing else to see
By Donald Jeffries
"I Protest"
December 31, 2025
Note: Many thanks to Peter Secosh for much of this information. He has helped me immensely with his incomparable research skills.
Our Congress, which is noted for honestly representing the interests of the general, unwashed, riffraff public, has forced the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. You know, the ones that Donald Trump called a "Democrat hoax." The ones that Kash Patel and Pam Bondi said didn't exist. Thank goodness they exist again.
First, we were treated to intriguing photos of the world's only teacher without a college degree, in the company of Bill Gates. And Woody Allen. And Noam Chomsky. And lots of Bill Clinton. There was also Donald Trump, accompanied by what looked to be a very young girl, perhaps the same very young girl photographed with Bill Clinton. Strangely enough, there were photos of Epstein with Steve Bannon. Supposedly, Bannon interviewed Epstein extensively, but has curiously never released that to the public. Really, everyone who is anyone was photographed with this kind and humble sex trafficker/blackmailer. Walter Cronkite- the voice of the owl for decades at Bohemian Grove. Jimmy Buffet. Woody Allen, who infamously married his own stepdaughter. Michael Jackson, indicating perhaps there was an underage boys' stable as well on Lolita Island. Mick Jagger, looking morose next to Ghislaine Maxwell. Couldn't all those celebrities get underage girls on their own?
Then the documents started coming out. The redactions were hilarious. It was like J. Edgar Hoover and James Jesus Angleton were back in power again, responding to FOIA requests with a bunch of black lines. One of those files without many redactions revealed that Jeffrey Epstein, the non-Irish math teacher turned billionaire, was a bit of a racist. It seems that he preferred to traffic underage White girls. He was quoted as saying, "Why are you bringing me a dark girl?" Now, raping underage girls is one thing, but being selective about the race of your victims is a far more serious offense in our "Woke" society. How are they ever going to make a movie about this, without a lot of diversity ? Seriously, some of the documents consist of entirely redacted text. Is the claim "national security" here ? Why would anything having to do with the actions of a vile sex trafficker be classified ? I mean, are you trying to say that our leaders have a vested interest in covering this up ? Think about the children!
While the photos show some kind of relationship between Epstein and prominent figures from the entertainment world, and the intellectual and government elite, the documents don't disclose any specific allegations. We can see several different females, for instance, pictured with a grinning Bill Gates, but their faces are blacked out. You can't really tell just how underage they are, or even if they are underage. It's still creepy, to use the term the young girls like to throw at bothersome incels, to see so many females with redacted faces, next to boisterous married men like Gates, Clinton, Trump, and others. However, there have been a few real blockbuster files released. Files which weren't completely redacted. Files which do list horrific allegations against a named individual. Nothing about Woody Allen. Or Michael Jackson. Both of whom have been suspected of being "minor attracted." Nothing against Bill Clinton, who was accused of violent rape by two different women.
The most explosive accusation comes from an August 3, 2020 FBI file, which concerns a then thirteen year old girl, who claimed to have been raped repeatedly in 1984 and eventually impregnated. She charged that she had been trafficked by her uncle and Jeffrey Epstein. Most of the criminal activity took place on a yacht in Lake Michigan. She described how "different men, and a few women and girls, would come to a variety of boats and yachts and pay money to force me to do (redacted) with them when I was 13 and pregnant." But she did name one person. A very well known guy whom I like to call Trumpenstein. This unnamed woman claimed that Trump "participated regularly in paying money to force me to (redacted) with him and he was present when my uncle murdered my newborn child and disposed of the body in Lake Michigan." Trump is known to have owned and sailed a yacht on Lake Michigan. Don't the rich and powerful usually abort their mistakes ? Was this a ritual sacrifice?
The first thing that leaps out, at least at me, is the fact that only Donald Trump is named here, as having participated in such heinous activities. What about all the other "different men?" Why have so many of these Epstein files been released in entirely redacted form, rendering them meaningless, while this one included such horrid details ? And remember, these files are coming from Trump's justice department. With his sudden opposition to having the files released, wasn't it assumed that this was to hide his own culpability ? So why then would the FBI not redact references to Trump in this file ? There must have been other accusations, from other former underage victims, which were redacted. By Trump's justice department. Well, maybe Kash Patel was trying to protect Noam Chomsky. Or Woody Allen. Or Trumpenstein's new close chum Bill Gates. It's not like we haven't heard lots of accusations against Slick Willie. The media would have just ignored them as usual.
One would, in fact, expect the opposite; for the Trump justice department to protect his reputation, and ideally focus on the misbehavior of Clinton and assorted Hollywood liberals. Isn't Trumpenstein always at war with Hollywood liberals ? But not here. Not in these Epstein file releases. In yet another damning file, which again contained far fewer redactions than most, an unnamed limo driver from Texas recounted picking up Trump in 1995. He reported that some of the things he could hear Trump saying on his cell phone were very concerning, to such an extent that he came very close to pulling him out of the limo and "hurting him." He heard Trump say the name "Jeffrey" repeatedly and refer to "abusing some girl." The file gets confusing, and the driver seems to quote a girl, whom online researchers claim is Dusti Rhea Duke, as saying, with a "stone cold demeanor," that "he raped me."
The driver then declares that this girl had stated, "Donald J. Trump had raped her along with Jeffrey Epstein." She reported that "some girl with a funny name," presumably Ghislaine Maxwell, "took me into a fancy hotel or building, that's how it happened." The driver advised her to call the police, but the girl said, "They will kill me." However, the girl phoned the driver on Christmas Day to say that she had indeed spoken to the police. The driver told her that she had "done good." He heard nothing else from this girl until January 10, 2000, when "(redacted) reached out to (redacted- the driver) stating (redacted- the girl) was dead and noted she was found with her head 'blown off' in Kiefer, OK. Officers on the scene and (redacted) stated there was no way it was a suicide." There is mention of a redacted person stating she killed herself because of a Mexican drug cartel, and closes with "(redacted) feels the murder is a cover for Ghislaine." Why not make it timely, with "narco-terrorists" from Venezuela?
What's been completely lost in these mostly redacted file releases is the fact that little is being mentioned about Epstein's role in blackmailing his high profile friends. In any real investigation of the Epstein case, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak would be one of the first witnesses to be interrogated. Barak is known to have spent an inordinate amount of time at Jeffrey Epstein's residence. What interest would the former head of a nation have in a math teacher/financial advisor turned dangerous sex trafficker ? What exactly would they have in common ? Epstein's Girl Friday Ghislaine is the daughter of powerful Mossad operative Robert Maxwell. It doesn't take a lot of creative theorizing to connect Epstein's shocking non-Irish success story, and his close friend Barak, to some kind of intelligence/blackmail operation. Remember, Epstein had cameras everywhere. The authorities found a lot of video in the safe in Epstein's New York residence, but they "lost" all that evidence.
In just a few months, we've gone from Donald Trump, Jr. continuing to ask publicly for the release of the Epstein files, to Kash Patel and Dan Bongino unconvincingly declaring what no one believes- that Epstein killed himself, to Trumpenstein abruptly trying to block the release of the files, calling it all a "Democrat hoax," to Pam Bondi saying there was no Epstein file (after earlier saying the files were on her desk), to the Democrats, in complete unison, demanding their release. Now, why would the Democrats support the release of files which should logically incriminate their beloved Bill Clinton, and half of their beloved Hollywood ? Democrats are not known for being impartial in these matters. And most laughably, Bill Clinton publicly urged Trump to release everything. Yes, Clinton has always been transparent about high crimes and coverups. Maybe next he'll demand an inquiry into the lurid allegations against his loving wife Hillary, which are supposedly on Anthony Weiner's laptop.
Now, no one is going to demand that the contents of Anthony Weiner's laptop ever be released. That's if they can find it. Or Hunter Biden's laptop. If they can find it. Remember, early on there were allegations that Hunter's laptop contained a video of Hunter raping a ten year old girl, as well as numerous images of his then fourteen year old niece in various states of undress. Someone tell Thomas Massie about that. It's not like Jeffrey Epstein was the only sex trafficker/statutory rapist in town. The Finders, the Franklin Credit Scandal, McMartin preschool; there are a multitude of examples of child sex scandals which have gone underreported and unpunished. So, especially considering the glitterati linked to this particular scandal, it is exceedingly unusual that so many people, including the entire Democratic party, now suddenly want to get to the bottom of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Can we really imagine Bill Gates, and Bill Clinton, and anyone in Hollywood, being held accountable here?