By Donald Jeffries
"I Protest"
April 20, 2026
The recent adventure of NASA's Artemis II, which our kept press lauded as an "historic" mission, drummed home just how hoodwinked the American public is. I remember it being "historic" in 1968 when astronauts Borman, Anders, and Lovell accomplished the exact same thing- orbiting the moon, on Apollo 8.
CBS News, now being run by Israeli Firster Bari Weiss, claimed that Aretmis II "set a record" for the "farthest distance humans have ever traveled from our planet." Except that every one of the six Apollo missions that allegedly landed on the moon traveled a slightly longer distance, to the surface. How do they make such claims with a straight face ? I mean, is the moon farther away now than it was in those hallowed years from 1969-1972, when we somehow had the technology to drive a collapsible moon buggy around the lunar surface, and hit golf balls into the non-atmosphere there ? Also, we were able to travel this "farthest" distance in less time than we can in the Year of our Lord 2026. It's a disappearing technology thing, you wouldn't understand. I'm not sure which CBS I like best, the new ultra-Zionist outfit, or the warm and cuddly "space age" version, presided over by Walter Cronkite- you know, the voice of the owl for decades at the yearly Cremation of Care occult ritual at Bohemian Grove.
We knew that they'd try to reboot manned voyages. Except now it's more diverse, with a suitably long haired female on board. You need that long hair so that it can stand up on video, B-52s style, during those worthless, kindergarten level "experiments" they do for whatever audience is actually watching. The hair sticking up shows they aren't in gravity any more, you see. So does them floating around their small craft. Sometimes they do flips. They probably learn that at astronaut school. And now, of course, there is the prerequisite African-American on board. You can't have a modern fake space mission without an African-American. I'm surprised there was only one. And no transgenders ? Yet. Be patient. They may even perform a live "transition" in space at some point. These modern astronauts smile vacuously at the camera, just like the girls on the Today show. If Katie Couric was younger, she'd be perfect for this role. You just know they're eventually going to fit in some cooking and food tasting.
Really, if they wanted us to believe this was real, why did they launch Artemis II on April 1 ? April Fools Day ? Come on ! And they still haven't figured out a way to CGI in some stars in the endless universe ? Does it make any sense that we can see stars from the surface of the Earth, but not the surface of the moon, which has no atmosphere ? Being as how this is more than fifty years after we supposedly last bounced up and down on the moon, we had a right to expect some cool selfies on board that craft. And there were selfies. But somehow, none of the four astronauts, not the brave and strapping African-American, not the narcissistic White woman, thought to grin into the camera with the big, blue Earth in the background ? I mean, they took selfies as they were orbiting the moon. Talk about remote reception ! That's almost as impressive as President Nixon's live phone call to the moon in 1969. Using a landline. But no one thought to turn their IPhones towards the biggest thing in the sky?
How could they miss that stupendously large, rapidly spinning globe of ours ? Some have told me that you wouldn't actually see it spinning. Well, I don't know. It's not like I'm Galileo. Even if you don't see the spin, you should see the clouds moving, and the topography changing, shouldn't you ? But since NASA has only produced a handful of photos that aren't composites or CGI, of our wonderful planet, we can't really know. Sure, we can look at the Universal Pictures logo, which appeared at the beginning of Universal films starting in the late 1920s. That globe is spinning. Not sure how the Unchosen executives running Universal had such information. But they simply never will show our entire planet. Why ? The magnificent Hubble telescope has given us fantastic views of galaxies light years away. But they just can't figure a way to train a camera from one of their manned or unmanned missions on the sight most of us would really like to see. You know, the place where we live. Our big, beautiful 'hood.
Now, to be fair, the selfie taking astronauts also failed to try and capture any of the moon landing sites. That would have been cool. That would have shut up all the crazy, irresponsible "conspiracy theorists." The ones who "deny" the greatest accomplishment in the history of the world. The one which was so historic that they lost the original video of the first mission, Apollo 11. I didn't get a good look at the Artemis II craft, so I don't know if they lined it with more than two inches of very Earthly aluminum, as they did with the Apollo pieces of junk. Maybe they used four inches this time. And they apparently made it safely through the deadly Van Allen radiation belt. Remember a few years back, when NASA panicked at the Space Shuttle coming without a few thousand miles of Van Allen ? The same dangerous radiation belt that the Apollo astronauts cruised through with no problem. So at least we have a hearty, diverse crew that can withstand this belt, unlike the Space Shuttle wimps.
Everything about NASA is a lie. There has never been a "space shuttle." There has supposedly been craft that orbits the Earth, slightly higher than airplanes. These shuttles have never approached space. Taxpayers primarily fund their kindergarten experiments, and wild hair raising flips to entertain the earthly riff raff. Somebody tell DOGE. One Space Shuttle astronaut was Mark Kelly, who went on to be elected to the Senate by the eminently wise voting public. Kelly is the husband of former Rep. Gabby Giffords, whose January 2011 shooting ushered in an era of dubious mass casualty events. So you know he'd never be part of any mass charade. Whether it was the original Apollo missions, the Space Shuttle, or now Artemis, it has never been adequately explained how human waste is disposed of. I mean, even magical African-Americans and self-absorbed White women have to use the bathroom. Except there are no bathrooms on these spacecraft. So where does all the waste go?
We were told that in 2024, some kind of mechanical failure wound up stranding Space Shuttle astronauts in the "station" for nine months. What ? Leave aside the question of all those months of human waste material, what about provisions ? If they were planning for a short mission, where did the food and water come from, to permit them to survive for all those months ? Does Door Dash now deliver to space ? You'd need a lot more water than should logically have been on board for such a period of time. Did they find a hidden spring in space ? You know, that black emptiness where stars cannot be seen. Only very occasional Earth crescents. And what did they smell like after nine months without a shower ? I'm sorry for having to ask these indelicate questions, but someone has to. It comes with the territory when you're a Thought Criminal. What about the marvelous, empowered female astronauts ? How do they handle their monthly visitor in such a situation ? Is there any privacy in space?
Maybe if we hadn't been lied to so much, for so long, then people like me might not pay attention to the little details with the Artemis II expedition. We might even gloss over the repeated references to its "historic" nature. My mind might not go so quickly to questions of bodily functions. I suppose it's unpatriotic to question it. Maybe even anti-Semitic, since everything is anti-Semitic now. But it's the same inquisitive perspective one develops after years of observation. Pattern recognition is a chic new term for it. I'm recognizing patterns. Nothing they say adds up. In space, or on the surface of our madly spinning planet. I don't know what's really happening in Iran, but I do know they haven't been killing Americans for 47 years. I do know that renewing FISA would be an awful thing, no matter how many times Trump flip flops on it. I do know men cannot give birth. I do know that in the 1960s, Black women were unlikely to be the best NASA mathematicians, no matter what Hollywood says.