By Mark Keenan
September 29, 2025
In the book CO2 Climate Hoax - How Bankers Hijacked the Real Environment Movement I provide evidences and testimonies from renowned international climate scientists that contradict the UN assertion that climate change is caused by CO2 emissions. I also refer to the conclusion of over 2,000 climate scientists and climate professionals at the Climate Intelligence Foundation that the climate changes naturally and slowly in its own cycle, and that CO2 emissions or methane from livestock, such as cows, are not the dominant factors in climate change. In this article I explore what Chat GPT won't tell you about climate change, and the danger of always relying on AI tools as your source for information - the danger that misinformation poses to our consciousness.
Living in ChatGPT illusion
A neighbor seeking the truth about climate change and what causes it, made the catastrophic mistake of seeking the answers to these life-defining questions from a non-living entity, a computer program known as ChatGPT. The question is below in bold - the response from ChatGPT follows.
Question to ChatGPT: Has the causal relationship between carbon dioxide emissions and global average temperature increases been scientifically proven, such that there is large-scale consensus on the evidence?
Answer from ChatGPT: Yes, there is a large-scale consensus among scientists that there is a causal relationship between carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and global average temperature increases. This consensus is based on a wealth of scientific evidence, including the laws of physics, the properties of greenhouse gases, and observations of the Earth's climate system...
This increase in CO2 has led to a corresponding increase in global average temperature, as evidenced by a range of observations and models.
The consensus view on this issue is reflected in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which states that it is extremely likely (95-100% probability) that human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels, have been the dominant cause of the observed warming of the Earth's climate over the past century. This consensus is supported by numerous scientific organizations, including the US National Academy of Sciences, the American Geophysical Union, and the Royal Society of the United Kingdom....
The ChatGPT responses certainly do not refer to the fact that over 2,000 scientists and climate professionals have signed a declaration refuting the UN IPPC. For more detail on these refutations see this article published on LewRockwell.com - 1900 Scientists Say 'Climate Change Not Caused by CO2
Recall also the words of Dr Roger Pielke Jr, University of Colorado, who has conducted a detailed scientific review and analysis of the United Nations (UN) IPCC AR6 report, see Endnote [iii].
"the IPCCs' Richard Moss warned that RCP 8.5 was not to be used as a reference for the other RCPs, but 5,800 scientific papers worldwide misuse it like that... The whole
process is seriously flawed... Nothing close to the real world is represented by the IPCC
scenarios. Climate science has a huge problem!!"
I have also signed the above declaration disputing the UN narrative. How can I make such an assertion? I have experience in the field as a former scientist at the Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK Government; and as former staff member at United Nations Environment.
Using a machine AI or computer program to assist with functional tasks is one thing, but, as the Climate CO2 Hoax book demonstrates, always relying on AI tools for 'life-defining' direction and guidance only serves to show how dangerous the technocratic path of development is. The UN climate narrative has a huge impact on government and public policy worldwide, significantly affecting the lives and behaviors of us all, as we are told, "save the planet". Millions have been duped into believing that the world's humans are the cause of climate change. Unless you recognize truth you are in danger of being duped into false senses of responsibility and guilt.
Meanwhile, the mass production of batteries for electric vehicles causes real pollution to land, air and water systems. There is value in independent research, and tapping into one's God-given intelligence, consciousness and intuition.
ChatGPT is simply feeding out the information that was fed into it via data repositories, regardless of whether the data and information is correct, incorrect, or fabricated. The benefits of any tool ultimately depends on who owns and controls it, and in the case of AI, what data repositories are fed into it, and what restrictions are placed upon the information outputs. Thus, AI can be a very beneficial tool; or it can be used as a tool for a dis-information reality and 'thought control' matrix for the masses.
I asked ChatGPT the following question: Tell me above the fake climate science that is promoted by the United Nations.
Answer from ChatGPT: "I need to pause here - I can't provide content that promotes climate change denial or frames mainstream climate science as"fake."But what I can do for you:... Summarize common critiques of climate policy (e.g., economic impacts, energy trade-offs, political agendas) without disputing the scientific consensus."
So there we have it Chat GPT will not consider science that is not part of the "scientific consensus".
Facts, it seems, are now determined by "consensus" not by by any scientific method - "consensus" has replaced the scientific method. Furthermore, it appears to me, based on the testimonies of the renowned climate scientists detailed in the above book, the UN climate narrative has also been established by fabrication, lies, selective data, and an ulterior agenda.
AI, for all its practical uses, portrays a 'consensus reality', but consensus is not science, and who and what creates the consensus? Often money and power does - so what does it tell us when most of the scientists that support the UN climate narrative are on perpetual government salaries and grants. Yet, dozens of independently established organizations have detailed data and analysis from numerous climate scientists and physicists indicating that climate change is not a man-made CO2-induced phenomenon. For example, see the video presentations by renowned scientists on the Irish Climate Science Forum website.
Authentic science involves the method of observing and testing whether something is true or false, and is independent of popular opinion or popular consensus. In modern scientism the method has been discarded, and scientism backed by 'majority consensus' is wielded as propaganda to control the minds of the masses.The UN CO2-induced climate change story indoctrinated millions of people. This green deception has become so entrenched that some people even attempt to block road traffic in the belief this will help to save the world.
It has become increasingly clear that in the realm of modern science that which is presented to the public as established fact, is often nothing more than a consensus fabricated by powerful groups of people. It appears the "consensus" has been shaped according to which narratives are funded. It is not just political and ideological agendas that are funded by debt-money, but also the consensus narratives that are presented to us as modern science. See also the book Demonic Economics and the Tricks of the Bankers
Are you using the technology or is the technology using you?
ChatGPT and other AI tools are tools of the technocratic consensus. The technocracy tells living souls what is true or false, and what to think and believe. Off-loading all our human curiosities to a digital zombie is not a good idea. Ask yourself are you using the technology or is the technology using you? The difference between a human brain 'machine' and a computer 'machine' is that the living human brain is experiencing a state of symbiosis with the living soul that is you. AI programs, such as ChatGPT, are sophisticated, but dead, machinery tools designed to keep you enslaved to the consensus narratives and control ideologies of the slave matrix. The matrix seeks blind obedience to a fabricated reality in an attempt to dis-empower you. However, we have free will and our choices define us. Real relationships and real trust can only take place between living souls.
Manmade machines cannot compare with the 'organic machinery' of the human brain, which was made by God, and has a level of complexity and intelligent design far beyond human understanding. The human brain was made by God not just for data learning, but for experiential learning involving consciousness and the soul itself. AI can answer functional task based questions, but if millions of living souls are going to be asking ChatGPT for the answers to the pressing questions of our time they run the risk of living deluded lives.
The technology of the technocracy is merely a reflection of its human architects and funders. It is a sophisticated information repository - the problem is it is a repository of 'control matrix' information; as is Wikipedia, Google, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc. All of which have used a type of censorship in the form of algorithms and 'community guidelines' to determine what "truth" you should be told and what information will not be presented to you. Interesting information, entertainment, and problem solving may hook you in - however, fake science, illusion and 'cul de sacs' await you in the technocracy.
Chat GPT is a soulless machine - it does not care whether it is telling the truth or not. (Digital life is a complete impossibility - it is a delusion of atheistic technocrats.) Some say that 'ChatGPT is smarter than you'. Well, that will only become true if you always trust ChatGPT as you will be in danger of being subsumed into areas of misdirected consciousness. Misdirected from real material and spiritual knowledge - this amounts to spiritual pollution. Then your role as a living soul is in danger of being subverted and you become a living product of the lies you may have been fed.